Misc. Hinky Meter (by Valhall) Blog Entries

I have always thought, after reading about that flurry of calls Casey made on the 16th was to determine exactly where Cindy was, how muich time she had at the house before Cindy arrived home. She needed some time to do whatever she was doing, to cover up her horrific crime.

Timer55 and the Anthony Conspiracy

Posted on February 12th, 2010 by Valhall

The first time we, the public, can tell timer55 was possibly used as a password by either Casey or some one in the Anthony family was on May 14, 2008 at 8:49 am when the “owner” account on the Anthony desktop appears to have been changed from timer55 to rico23. (Many thanks to Maura-pedia for this correction!)

According to a statement made by Lee, this most likely is not the first time Casey had used the password timer55. Of course, Lee could be lying, but we have the statement made by him in his 2009 deposition, on page 363. Lee states Jesse knew of Casey using timer55 as a password in just the first couple of days after July 16th, 2008. Lee was trying to figure out the password to Casey’s Photobucket (so he could destroy evidence there) and was talking to Jesse on the phone, who provided him the password to the account. Lee commented that Casey had a lot of weird passwords, and Lee states Jesse responded with “Yeah. You know, like timer55.”

Read the rest:
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1661

I wonder if that is indicative of the number of men she had sex with or the number of times she had sex??? and the other password seems to be one third of 69...wonder what that means???

wow.... IF KC was using this password timer55 in may, that kinda kills her argument that it was changed after caylee was "kidnapped".. to be used to give her instructions on how to party and steal to get her back.. lol..
the other thing i find interesting, is that lee made it a point to say jesse knew her passwords. ... another failed attempt to put jesse in the hotseat maybe??

I actually think that the Timer55 password may have something to do with the amount of time (55 days) there was from the date she changed the password until the trip to Puerto Rico (that I'm pretty sure she KNEW she wasn't going to be able to go on all along).....

We may never know, since KC will never tell and the other A's have no trouble lying about what they know (even under oath).

Some Interesting Observations on today’s Discovery

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1700

[b]We interrupt this blog for a special bulletin…



Posted on March 8th, 2010 by Valhall [/b]

BOMB-F***ING-SHELL!
The Caylee Marie Anthony murder HAS BEEN SOLVED! (not) We can expect the release of the felon Casey Anthony concerning the charges of the murder of her own child within minutes. (not) Was it Joy Wray who solved this case? NO! Was it O’Town Finest? NO! Was it slick-dick Dom? NO! It was none other than the notorious crime fighter and mystery solver James L. McIntyre.
Who the hell is James L. McIntyre?
Well, I can’t believe you don’t know who he is. He’s famous! He’s a lawyer or was, or may be again, but it’s real unclear as to which is true. At least once, for sure, he was a lawyer. Then he got drunk, drove drunk and killed a guy. He got convicted of manslaughter, motor vehicle homicide and causing bodily injury while operating a vehicle recklessly and negligently while shit-faced drunk. THEN, he decided drinking wasn’t working out well for him so he got busted for snorting cocaine. Well, at least he had cocaine on him. He could have been shoving it in his ear for all I know (I doubt it) – but he had cocaine. Of course, some where in this mix he lost his license to practice law.
After that he served time in prison, swept floors for community service and lived with his daddy. Then his brother (who still had his law license) said he’d take him on as a partner and the benevolent Justice Cown, in October 2000, reinstated this mullet-head’s ability to lawyer. I’m not sure what happened after that, but it doesn’t appear he has his “lawyering license” anymore, so he could have been snortin’, drinkin’ or just bein’ himself for all I know.
He has solved many crimes (in his own mind). Pig-dog farmer-killer Pickton case. (not) He’d have already solved the JonBenet Ramsey case if they would have just let him. (not) And he knows the answer to a lot of other crimes as well! (not) Like who killed Jodi Sue Huisentruit. And he’s found valuable evidence concerning the Jennifer Odom murder. (not) Of course, only he knows the answers. (not)
And such is the case with the Caylee Marie Anthony murder. (not)
We’ve seen James “Lyin” McIntyre before. He passed emails to slick-dick Dom and Cindy and he’s posted on numerous blogs and discussion boards using various aliases for some unknown reason….all the while an avid supporter of Casey and her innocence and her FREEDOM! Now that goal is in sight. (not)
So, how did he bust this case? Well, it’s simple. He emailed the Orlando Sentinel all the goods. Because THAT’S where the goods get sent when you know the truth about a murder case. (not)
This is what he said:
Zenaida “Zani” Fernandez-Gonzalez
is
Gloria Fernandez-Gonzalez, 28 years old. Evicted from Apartment 210 of Sawgrass apartments on February 25, 2008.
Hold the check – uhhh, no she wasn’t. On page 53 of the discovery released on August 25, 2008 it clearly states that the tenants evicted from Apartment 210 of Sawgrass apartments were Stacy and Joseph Oaks??? No “Gloria”, no “Fernandez” and no “Gonzalez” (or Gonzale if you’re Cindy Anthony). And why are we talking about a “Gloria” Fernandez-Gonzalez? I thought Zanny’s name was “Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzalez”. I mean that’s what Casey Anthony, at her moment of opportunity to enlist assistance in finding her daughter, who had been missing for 31 days according to her, told the detectives repeatedly. In fact, she even put it in her written statement. No – there’s no “Gloria” in there. The only place “Gloria” comes up is in the name Casey gave the investigators for the name of Zenaida’s mother. And Zenaida’s mother can’t be 28 years old.
Uber-sleuth McIntyre answers this for us. (not)
He’s talking about Gloria Fernandez-Gonzalez Jr! Yep – the first hispanic woman in history to take the “junior” title. Why? Because her mother’s name is Gloria Fernandez-Gonzalez Sr…that’s why!
Oh wait – I thought Zanny’s hyphenated name was because of the joining of her mother and father’s last names. How could her mother have the same hyphenated last name? Unless…INCEST! That’s what has led Zanny (aka Gloria) to do what she’s done. Her mother conceived her in an incestuous relationship with…her own father and her husband’s brother!
But wouldn’t that mean it should be Gloria Fernandez-Gonzalez-Fernandez-Gonzalez Jr? or Gloria Fernandez-Fernandez-Gonzalez-Gonzalez Jr? Or maybe Gloria Fernandez²-²Gonzalez² Jr? I’m not sure at this point. But I still don’t see “Zenaida” in this mix, double mix, or remix.
Now Gloria moved in with her sister Daisy. But here’s the rub – we haven’t got a clue whether this was Gloria Jr (aka Zenaida, aka Zanny) or Gloria Sr. ONE OF THEM died their hair blond and they were at the airport and Wanda Wery and her son saw them on July 2, 2008. Whichever Gloria this was is 5′7″, 135 lbs when Wanda saw them. And Mensa-McIntyre says Airport Security will CONFIRM. But here’s the problem. For some unknown reason this evidence – which is key in solving the Caylee Anthony murder – was turned over to Justice Jose R. Rodriguez who is presiding over the CIVIL case with Zenaida Gonzalez. Why the hell this would have wound up with a civil court judge nobody knows, BUT madman-McIntyre claims Justice Rodriguez sealed it! (not)
Here’s what McIntyre claims:

Casey Marie Anthony DID NOT murder her daughter, she is INNOCENT! Her daughter Caylee Marie Anthony was KIDNAPPED! Orange County Circuit Court Judge Jose R. Rodriguez has the proof. He sealed BOTH the Police Sergeant’s written report AND the Orlando International Airport’s security camera flash card. The flash card is approximately 3.5 by 3.5 and has video evidence that clearly shows the KIDNAPPING of Caylee Marie Anthony by Zani The Nanny a.k.a. Gloria Fernandez-Gonzalez Jr. Age 28.

Okay, we’re clear now – it’s Gloria-Zanny-Zenaida-Fernandez-Gonzalez Jr that bleached her hair blond. BUT, how did the kidnapping take place in the Orlando Airport??? What was Casey doing there? Why didn’t she tell the detectives that GZZFGJr kidnapped Caylee at the airport??? It doesn’t make sense! And why does a civil case judge have these records??? And what does 3.5 by 3.5 mean? If that’s millimeters, that’s a little-bitty camera! If it’s feet, it’s frigging huge – it could have footage of all crimes committed since the Bay of Pigs went bad! And WHY did a judge presiding over a civil suit that didn’t even get filed until September 24, 2008 have evidence on a murder investigation in which the investigators went to the airport and reviewed the surveillance video on July 24, 2008! How does this happen?!
I smell a conspiraseh.
But wait, the evidence is compelling. Gloria Gonzalez (Jr?) crashed her car near Tampa, Fl on June 23, 2008. She drives a silver four-door 2008 Ford Focus with New York Plates! This has got to be her! An earlier attempt at kidnapping (with her sister Samantha Gonzalez (not born by incestuous relationships and therefore no need for superscripts)) failed at Jay Blanchard Park on June 16, 2008! Victor Fernandez is Gloria-squared’s step-father and he and his half-brother Hector hid Gloria-squared (aka Zanny) and Caylee. Gloria Sr left him over it!
The body – that was found in the swampy area on Suburban Drive – is that of “Baby Doe” who was murdered by her steroid-using father in spite of Baby Doe’s mother and grandmother (whatever the hell that means). The murder was cold and premeditated. (actually, this may be the first part Mc-snort got right).
“CAYLEE MARIE ANTHONY WAS KIDNAPPED BY NANNY/BABYSITTER THAT CASEY MADE THE MISTAKE OF TRUSTING”. (in the airport after she had already tried to kidnap Caylee once in Jay Blanchard Park – maybe Casey gave Zanny-Gloria-squared a mulligan).
This is it people. We’ve wasted our time looking at the facts. We wasted our time looking at the whole “why did she go partying instead of telling someone her baby was missing?”. We wasted our time with the entire “ick, there’s decomp gases and hair in the trunk deal”. And we have wasted our time with the fact that Caylee’s remains were found bagged in trash bags that match those at the Anthony home, a laundry bag that was previously at the Anthony home but is now missing, with a Pooh blanket that was at the Anthony home but is now missing, and with three pieces of duct tape over her skull that match duct tape on the Anthonys’ gas can and on their posters, and seen in an almost full roll at their command center BECAUSE….
Casey, after thwarting an attempt by the evil duo Zanny-Gloria-squared and evil-sister-Samantha in Jay Blanchard Park hid Caylee for 16 days while lying to all her friends about where Caylee was. To this day no one knows where Casey hid Caylee for those 16 days! At the end of those 16 days Casey went to the airport on July 2nd to…do something, but we have no idea what…and Caylee was kidnapped right there on video by bleach-blond Gloria-squared-Zanny! And if that evil rotten Judge Rodriguez would just unseal the 3.5 by 3.5 thingy he has…
this could all be over. (not)
Valhall.

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1931&cpage=2#comment-14093

That has got to be the most funny theory we've heard...What a way to start the day...Tomorrow should be a good day with the doc dump hitting the stands

My favorite part~Gloria squared.....LMAO

Val is hilarious!

Dis ~ Gloria squared....my fav too.

The Two-edged Sword of Hearsay

Posted on March 10th, 2010 by Valhall

Casey Anthony’s defense team has submitted a list of statements made by Casey and others that they are wanting declared as hearsay or as prejudicial and omitted from being entered into evidence during trial. The defense has basically bunched these statements in categories that they believe show they are prejudicial or hearsay. Those categories are:

•Characterization of Anthony Family Relationships
•Characterization of Casey as liar
•Hearsay
•Contents of Trunk
•Double (dammit) Hearsay
•Characterization of Casey as bad mother
•Characterization of Casey as thief
•Remains of Caylee
•Jesse (Grund) as father of Caylee
•Casey pregnancy
•Roy Kronk tip
•Characterization of Casey as drug user
•Characterization of Casey as frequent partier
•Hearsay (psychic) – (which must be a special subset of double dammit hearsay when a psychic is involved)
•Casey stealing (versus Casey being characterized as thief?)
•Casey’s second pregnancy
•Finding of Caylee Remains
Now, the ones that are “characterizations” or about Casey’s pregnancies pretty much boil down to – they don’t want anybody saying anything about Casey, or the Anthonys. UNLESS, that person is going to say that Casey was a good mother and the Anthony family was a good, wholesome family, and they were all fine, upstanding individuals. I think we can all see the problems with the defense trying to make that play out. While I have no doubt they can find SOMEONE who will make these statements about Casey and/or the Anthony family, the problem is they are going to get cross-examined. I don’t see that part of the witness-box time going well for the defense. In other words, the defense can’t put Amy Huizenga or Maria Kissh on the stand and ask “Did you think Casey was a good mother?” to which they probably would answer yes, without the prosecution getting up and asking “Did Casey take Caylee to parties where there were [fill in the blank - drugs?, smoking?, drinking?, etc.]? Did Casey leave Caylee unattended? (to which the answer is going to be yes)

As to whether Casey is a thief – that really doesn’t play too much into whether she murdered Caylee or not. But at the same time, the defense isn’t going to have too many options in showing Casey to have integrity as far as being self-sufficient, employed, a manager of finances, etc. And, again, any attempt to portray her as possessing these qualities is just going to open the door to the prosecution asking the right questions to the same witness and bringing out the fact that Casey didn’t work, didn’t financially support Caylee, and most likely lead to the revelation that the way she supported her own lifestyle (because that’s where all the money went – Casey, not Caylee) was through unapproved appropriation of funds! What a nice way to say – stealing!

To avoiding characterizing Casey as a liar, I say good luck. The problem the defense has with this is that Casey’s lies are part of her crimes. They “bleed over” into the cover up of the truth of what happened to Caylee and they contaminate the formal investigation. While the defense may be successful at preventing the presentation that Casey appears to have been a liar-extraordinaire for many years prior to Caylee’s death, they are not going to be successful at suppressing the fact that for a critical 31 day period in which Casey claims her daughter was kidnapped; claims she had no knowledge of her daughter’s whereabouts or welfare; and did not report either of those “facts” to the authorities, she lied to her family, her friends, and her casual acquaintances concerning where Caylee was. Nor are they going to be able to suppress that she never has tried to correct the record on any of those events.

Everything Casey did in the month that Caylee was missing and not reported go toward her state of mind, her consciousness of guilt, and her intentional acts to cover up that Caylee could NOT be accounted for. And that’s the main problem the defense has. While they have every legal right to request that Casey’s prior bad acts – or in this case, prior bad living – not come into play in trying to paint their client as…she is (lol), the problem is that her WORST period of behavior is in the month that is critical to the cover-up of her daughter’s murder. That month is not filled with “prior bad acts” but with contemporaneous, connected bad acts. Part and parcel of the reason Caylee was not reported missing for a month, evidence was allowed to be destroyed with time and exposure, and the true nature of Caylee’s death destroyed for prosecution purposes ARE Casey’s lies and bad behavior in that month. And as we’ve covered in a prior article, The Power of Circumstantial Evidence, there is precedence that intentionally not reporting your crime in order to make it “go away” doesn’t sit well with jurors, or with appellate judges!

Now, let’s turn to the hearsay that they want suppressed. Here’s where they create a true sticky-wicket due to the double-edged manner in which this could cut. Let’s just give an example of how this will hurt the defense’s only “strategy” we have hints of to date. On page 4 of the list of statements the defense has filed they want excluded is

Cindy tells Britney Schieber about finding the car.

The defense wants this declared hearsay and excluded. The problem is this means that one of the defense’s bulleted reasons in support of moving to have Kronk declared a suspect in Caylee’s murder…

A statement indicating that Mr. Kronk knew of the location of Caylee Anthony’s remains and indeed may have had possession or control of them in November 2008, weeks before he alerted law enforcement on December 11, 2008.

…becomes hearsay as well. And to be clear, this isn’t JUST a bulleted line item in support of declaring him a suspect. This is THE reason for wanting to declare him a suspect. This is the alleged phone call Kronk was supposed to have had with his son in November. The sword cuts both ways. If Cindy making any statements to anyone about her thoughts on the events surrounding the finding of the car is declared hearsay, anything Kronk said to anybody about his thoughts on what he had reported in August becomes hearsay as well. Which utterly destroys the defense’s only rabbit hole they had to hide in (not).

And there are many more examples that can be made to show how the defense’s move to declare statements of certain nature hearsay will have an extremely crippling effect on their attempt to establish Caylee’s body was NOT on Suburban Drive during the period from August to December, 2008, and that Kronk may be connected with the entire murder! This two-edged hearsay sword will literally cut the legs out from under the defense team.

But let’s back up and talk about how trying to avoid “negative characterization” of Casey is going to hit them. If Casey’s propensity to party with her child present is excluded, so will Kronk’s propensity to do the ol’ duct tape, hot-monkey sex thingy. If Casey’s inability to tell the truth, even when the truth is better for all involved, is excluded, the allegations that Kronk playing World of Warcraft is some type of bizarre evidence he can’t tell fantasy from reality will be excluded. If Casey’s characterization as a “bad mother” is excluded, Kronk’s “possible” (serious…POSSIBLE) history of inappropriate behavior with young girls (which by the way has so far been based ENTIRELY on the “double dammit hearsay” category) will be excluded.

Which leads to the final cut – that is the majority of the only strategy the defense has hinted at so far (i.e. pinning it on Kronk) will lay like so many bad scenes from a B movie on the editor’s floor. Basically what you’re left with in the defense’s motion concerning naming Kronk a suspect is the title and the signature page. All the guts kind of fall out.

Valhall.

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1962

A Review of the Submitted Hearsay

Posted on March 11th, 2010 by Valhall

I wanted to take a second look at the statements submitted by the defense that they want excluded as hearsay. I’m going to put my personal thoughts about these out here just to open discussion on the matter and with hopes that our legal friends will drop by and respond with more knowledge than I have on the possibility of these statements being excluded. I’ll be using abbreviations for names, so just refer to the defense’s submitted list if you get confused as to who is being referenced. I want to be clear, that these are just my personal opinions on these. I don’t claim to know the answer. But I think doing it this way could lead to some really good discussion if our lawyer-friends get involved.

Read the complete article here:

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1980

Zenaida? Benhaida? George the Gigolo?

Posted on March 12th, 2010 by Valhall

Huh?

http://www.wftv.com/news/22825765/detail.html

So George’s description of Zenaida closely matches a woman who claims to have had an affair with George? And George’s chippie has a sister with a last name Benhaida?

Benhaida-fo-faida-fee-fi-fo-faida-Zenaida?

And George allegedly took her for $5000 while they were screwing around? And he had other chippies, and he took them for money as well?

George is a gigolo?

WTF?

Valhall.

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1985

•Characterization of Anthony Family Relationships
•Characterization of Casey as liar
•Hearsay
•Contents of Trunk
•Double (dammit) Hearsay
•Characterization of Casey as bad mother
•Characterization of Casey as thief
•Remains of Caylee
•Jesse (Grund) as father of Caylee
•Casey pregnancy
•Roy Kronk tip
•Characterization of Casey as drug user
•Characterization of Casey as frequent partier
•Hearsay (psychic) – (which must be a special subset of double dammit hearsay when a psychic is involved)
•Casey stealing (versus Casey being characterized as thief?)
•Casey’s second pregnancy
•Finding of Caylee Remains

So Baez is taking out everything there is to talk about except what Casey swore to in that note she wrote last year where she claimed the only thing she agreed to was that she left Caylee with a nanny and never saw her again?

Did you all see that note? I'll try to find it. Casey didn't even give any details about how she left Caylee with the nanny or where etc. as if she were retracting everything and just going with how she left Caylee with the nanny (no name given) and never saw her again. That was IT in a nut shell!

So if Baez goes on just that statement of Casey's that HE got her to write last year, no wonder he wants everything else omitted.

LottieM~ I think he's just 'throwin spagetti at the wall to see what sticks" I also think he is trying to divert attention from the issue of who exactly has paid his salary for the last 1+ years....... and an ethics investigation if he brokered a media deal- a conflict of interest for any attorney - Now, if Jose had gotten a third party (attorney) involved to broker that deal on behalf of his client, an unaffiliated attorney to protect Casey's best interest and manage the assets, that would be another thing altogether. But he didn't. JMO. kh

PS: I am totally blown away by Vall's blog. kh

Check this out from Val's blog! Joy Wray, another criminal who loves the Anthonys!

5/31/98 – Fraudulent use of credit cards – adjudicated guilty
- Expired or revoked credit cards – adjudication withheld
- theft, obtaining credit cards through fraudulent means – reduced to theft – adjudication withheld
7/5/98 - trespassing – adjudicated guilty
7/7/98 - trespassing – adjudicated guilty
7/8/98 - trespassing – adjudicated guilty
9/4/98 - Battery – adjudicated guilty
- Battery – adjudicated guilty
9/26/98 – Burglary – reduced to criminal mischief – adjudicated guilty
10/07/98- criminal mischief – adjudicated guilty
10/20/98- charged with criminal mischief – disposition unknown
- trespassing – adjudicated guilty
- theft – adjudicated guilty
11/13/98- theft – adjudicated guilty

She seems to have settled down for almost a year after this. Maybe someone back in her past who actually cared about her got her some help. But a year was all she could make.

11/22/99- breach of peace, disorderly conduct – adjudicated guilty
- battery – adjudicated guilty
- obstructing justice, resisting officer – adjudicated guilty

After that she had about a year and a half that she laid low and stayed out of trouble (as far as law enforcement could tell). But then, in 2001, she rose to the surface (or sank to the bottom) again.

7/17/01 - retail theft – adjudicated guilty
10/8/01 - stalking – dropped/abandoned
11/6/01 - violation of a protective order, domestic violence – adjudicated guilty

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1108

ETA: Sorry, this was already posted in the Joy Wray thread!

http://www.realitychatter.com/caylee-anthony-f14/joy-wray-to-be-questioned-by-ocso-t1517-20.htm

thanks piper! 8)

i know i am a little late on this.... got finals this week... but i am seriously about the gloria squared!!

that article/theory was HILARIOUS!!!