Misc. Hinky Meter (by Valhall) Blog Entries

I actually think that the Timer55 password may have something to do with the amount of time (55 days) there was from the date she changed the password until the trip to Puerto Rico (that I'm pretty sure she KNEW she wasn't going to be able to go on all along).....

We may never know, since KC will never tell and the other A's have no trouble lying about what they know (even under oath).

Some Interesting Observations on today’s Discovery

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1700

The Two Dolls

Posted on February 16th, 2010 by Valhall

There seems to be some confusion over the fact that there are pictures of two different dolls. One of these dolls is a control doll that was tested to rule out returns from testing of the doll Cindy states was in Casey’s car when it was retrieved. In this link, pictures 3 through 16 are of Q244, the doll reported to have been in Casey’s car when it was retrieved from the impound lot. Pictures 17 through 24 are of the control doll which was tested to rule out that the residual level of chloroform detected in the Q244 doll didn’t come from the polyester fibers of the doll’s body.

From the November 6, 2009 discovery release, on page 922 we have the following notes:

Because the response to CHCL3 [chloroform] in Q244 was so small, needed to make sure that the residual CHCL3 may not have been generated from the polyester fibers of the doll. Compared the stuffing and material from a known doll that contained similar polyester fibers as did Q244 (H.K. City Toys FTY.LTD; ME 1015 OH PA941; PA PA941 (HK) MA T – 538 – M; Kerlavage). Took cuttings from both the front and back of the cloth and stuffing-parts of the known doll…

So the white-bodied doll is from Casey’s car and the pink-bodied doll is the “known doll”, or control doll.

Valhall.

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1711

We interrupt this blog for a special bulletin…

Posted on March 8th, 2010 by Valhall

BOMB-F***ING-SHELL!

The Caylee Marie Anthony murder HAS BEEN SOLVED! (not) We can expect the release of the felon Casey Anthony concerning the charges of the murder of her own child within minutes. (not) Was it Joy Wray who solved this case? NO! Was it O’Town Finest? NO! Was it slick-dick Dom? NO! It was none other than the notorious crime fighter and mystery solver James L. McIntyre.

Who the hell is James L. McIntyre?

Well, I can’t believe you don’t know who he is. He’s famous! He’s a lawyer or was, or may be again, but it’s real unclear as to which is true. At least once, for sure, he was a lawyer. Then he got drunk, drove drunk and killed a guy. He got convicted of manslaughter, motor vehicle homicide and causing bodily injury while operating a vehicle recklessly and negligently while shit-faced drunk. THEN, he decided drinking wasn’t working out well for him so he got busted for snorting cocaine. Well, at least he had cocaine on him. He could have been shoving it in his ear for all I know (I doubt it) – but he had cocaine. Of course, some where in this mix he lost his license to practice law.

Read more: http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1931&cpage=2#comment-14093

That has got to be the most funny theory we've heard...What a way to start the day...Tomorrow should be a good day with the doc dump hitting the stands

My favorite part~Gloria squared.....LMAO

Val is hilarious!

Dis ~ Gloria squared....my fav too.

The Two-edged Sword of Hearsay

Posted on March 10th, 2010 by Valhall

Casey Anthony’s defense team has submitted a list of statements made by Casey and others that they are wanting declared as hearsay or as prejudicial and omitted from being entered into evidence during trial. The defense has basically bunched these statements in categories that they believe show they are prejudicial or hearsay. Those categories are:

•Characterization of Anthony Family Relationships
•Characterization of Casey as liar
•Hearsay
•Contents of Trunk
•Double (dammit) Hearsay
•Characterization of Casey as bad mother
•Characterization of Casey as thief
•Remains of Caylee
•Jesse (Grund) as father of Caylee
•Casey pregnancy
•Roy Kronk tip
•Characterization of Casey as drug user
•Characterization of Casey as frequent partier
•Hearsay (psychic) – (which must be a special subset of double dammit hearsay when a psychic is involved)
•Casey stealing (versus Casey being characterized as thief?)
•Casey’s second pregnancy
•Finding of Caylee Remains

Read more: http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1962

A Review of the Submitted Hearsay

Posted on March 11th, 2010 by Valhall

I wanted to take a second look at the statements submitted by the defense that they want excluded as hearsay. I’m going to put my personal thoughts about these out here just to open discussion on the matter and with hopes that our legal friends will drop by and respond with more knowledge than I have on the possibility of these statements being excluded. I’ll be using abbreviations for names, so just refer to the defense’s submitted list if you get confused as to who is being referenced. I want to be clear, that these are just my personal opinions on these. I don’t claim to know the answer. But I think doing it this way could lead to some really good discussion if our lawyer-friends get involved.

Read the complete article here:

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1980

Zenaida? Benhaida? George the Gigolo?

Posted on March 12th, 2010 by Valhall

Huh?

http://www.wftv.com/news/22825765/detail.html

So George’s description of Zenaida closely matches a woman who claims to have had an affair with George? And George’s chippie has a sister with a last name Benhaida?

Benhaida-fo-faida-fee-fi-fo-faida-Zenaida?

And George allegedly took her for $5000 while they were screwing around? And he had other chippies, and he took them for money as well?

George is a gigolo?

WTF?

Valhall.

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1985

•Characterization of Anthony Family Relationships
•Characterization of Casey as liar
•Hearsay
•Contents of Trunk
•Double (dammit) Hearsay
•Characterization of Casey as bad mother
•Characterization of Casey as thief
•Remains of Caylee
•Jesse (Grund) as father of Caylee
•Casey pregnancy
•Roy Kronk tip
•Characterization of Casey as drug user
•Characterization of Casey as frequent partier
•Hearsay (psychic) – (which must be a special subset of double dammit hearsay when a psychic is involved)
•Casey stealing (versus Casey being characterized as thief?)
•Casey’s second pregnancy
•Finding of Caylee Remains

So Baez is taking out everything there is to talk about except what Casey swore to in that note she wrote last year where she claimed the only thing she agreed to was that she left Caylee with a nanny and never saw her again?

Did you all see that note? I'll try to find it. Casey didn't even give any details about how she left Caylee with the nanny or where etc. as if she were retracting everything and just going with how she left Caylee with the nanny (no name given) and never saw her again. That was IT in a nut shell!

So if Baez goes on just that statement of Casey's that HE got her to write last year, no wonder he wants everything else omitted.

LottieM~ I think he's just 'throwin spagetti at the wall to see what sticks" I also think he is trying to divert attention from the issue of who exactly has paid his salary for the last 1+ years....... and an ethics investigation if he brokered a media deal- a conflict of interest for any attorney - Now, if Jose had gotten a third party (attorney) involved to broker that deal on behalf of his client, an unaffiliated attorney to protect Casey's best interest and manage the assets, that would be another thing altogether. But he didn't. JMO. kh

PS: I am totally blown away by Vall's blog. kh

Check this out from Val's blog! Joy Wray, another criminal who loves the Anthonys!

5/31/98 – Fraudulent use of credit cards – adjudicated guilty
- Expired or revoked credit cards – adjudication withheld
- theft, obtaining credit cards through fraudulent means – reduced to theft – adjudication withheld
7/5/98 - trespassing – adjudicated guilty
7/7/98 - trespassing – adjudicated guilty
7/8/98 - trespassing – adjudicated guilty
9/4/98 - Battery – adjudicated guilty
- Battery – adjudicated guilty
9/26/98 – Burglary – reduced to criminal mischief – adjudicated guilty
10/07/98- criminal mischief – adjudicated guilty
10/20/98- charged with criminal mischief – disposition unknown
- trespassing – adjudicated guilty
- theft – adjudicated guilty
11/13/98- theft – adjudicated guilty

She seems to have settled down for almost a year after this. Maybe someone back in her past who actually cared about her got her some help. But a year was all she could make.

11/22/99- breach of peace, disorderly conduct – adjudicated guilty
- battery – adjudicated guilty
- obstructing justice, resisting officer – adjudicated guilty

After that she had about a year and a half that she laid low and stayed out of trouble (as far as law enforcement could tell). But then, in 2001, she rose to the surface (or sank to the bottom) again.

7/17/01 - retail theft – adjudicated guilty
10/8/01 - stalking – dropped/abandoned
11/6/01 - violation of a protective order, domestic violence – adjudicated guilty

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1108

ETA: Sorry, this was already posted in the Joy Wray thread!

http://www.realitychatter.com/caylee-anthony-f14/joy-wray-to-be-questioned-by-ocso-t1517-20.htm

thanks piper! 8)

i know i am a little late on this.... got finals this week... but i am seriously about the gloria squared!!

that article/theory was HILARIOUS!!!

Lottie, check out this older thread here on RC in regards to Ms. Joy Wray....interesting videos

http://www.realitychatter.com/caylee-anthony-f14/joy-wray-to-be-questioned-by-ocso-t1517.htm

thanks Piper! I got too excited and didn't go looking for a thread about Joy.

Well, it wasn't labeled Joy Wray! Did you check out Joy's video's?

Piper wrote:Well, it wasn't labeled Joy Wray! Did you check out Joy's video's?

Oh! well, I'm a lamer than I thought today! LOL

I haven't watched it yet. Every time I sit down here to play someone here wants something, like food or some other nonsense. :)