Leonard Padilla and his Daisy Chain Theory

by Snaz on Mon Mar 01, 2010 4:23 pm

Daisy Chains and Media Whores

Posted on March 1st, 2010 by Valhall

Many will take issue with this due to their misguided concept of Nancy Grace being some kind of warrior for the victim. To them I say…think what you wish. As for me, I’ll stick with the abundance of evidence available on videos and transcripts from the Nancy Grace shows that tell a different story.

I guess the first thing I’d like to clearly shout from the mountain is – I’m so sick of hearing Nancy claim BOMBSHELL I could give up my guacamole. I feel like quoting Inigo Montoya from The Princess Bride after Vizzini says for the umpteenth time INCONCEIVABLE!!!

“You keep using that word.

I do not think it means what you think it means.”

Only I’m pretty sure Nancy knows exactly what the word means and chooses to use it anyway. And the clearest sign Nancy is willfully and GAINFULLY milking a Tom Cat comes when she has the self-confessed other media whore, Leonard Padilla, on her show. Because, and let’s be clear on this, Leonard hasn’t ever known a damned thing. In over a year and half of him sitting there chomping his toothpick and mumbling like a drunken sailor, he’s not known a damned thing. Now…Tracey might know something! But not Leonard.

Who is Leonard? That’s a very important question that needs to be answered honestly in order to set the syllables that issue from his mustache in the correct pile of either shit or shinola. Leonard is the FOOL who spent $50,000 to bond a liar and a murderer out of jail on the hopes she would take him to her daughter and he’d get up in the rich and famous for cracking the case. The record shows it wasn’t a very lucrative investment. And if it were not for Nancy-Bombshell-Grace, he wouldn’t have had ANY return on investment on it at all. No wonder it’s such a love-fest when he’s on her program.

Read more:
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1781

by randilynn on Mon Mar 01, 2010 6:55 pm

and that's all i have to say bout' that.

by LottieM on Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:11 pm

I never liked Leonard, for one thing for helping get Casey bailed out! She didn't need to get bailed out. She didn't need a break from sitting behind bars bored to tears. She didn't need to be eating what she wanted, taking showers when she wanted, going on day outings to Baez's office where she had complete privacy, or mocking her daughter's death by pretending to be a victim and loving mother walking around with that notebook with a picture of Caylee hanging off it.

I don't believe Leonard could be so stupid to think Casey would tell him where Caylee was "after she got a hot shower and did her nails" like he said he thought she would. All he wanted was to showboat on National TV.

In the beginning he even said he believed the nanny kidnap story! Who else ever believed that nonsense? He's the only one as far as I know unless you count Cindy and George and Lee who are lying.

by Snaz on Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:49 pm

I wanted to believe in LP in the beginning... and I gave him every benefit of doubt. But this daisy chain theory is just so WAY OUT THERE, that it sounds like something CA came up with!

When you think about all the theories he has spouted on NG, has he ever been right about ANY of them? I don't think so... but I could be wrong.....

by Julie on Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:17 am

I like LP, but I didn't like that he got her out. He thought a shower & a manicure would get her talking, but didn't she say a few things while out in front of Tracey....they haven't even found her clothes yet, and something about the timeline being wrong in regards to the pool ladder. I know he was hoping for more.

Remember how she wanted to be able to travel around town without the monitoring device? (or was it without LP & his people? I can't remember which one is right.) I bet she would have gone and checked on Caylee's remains if they had let her do that.

They should have approved her silly request & had the FBI follow her, or a SWAT team, that would have been better.

by Snaz on Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:38 am

For reference, these are the comments LP made on Nancy Grace Friday night:

GRACE: Out to bounty hunter Leonard Padilla, joining us from Sacramento, California. You and your team observed her when she was out on bond. What do you make of this newly discovered secret evidence that the judge himself is keeping under wraps?

LEONARD PADILLA, BOUNTY HUNTER: Well, way back, I came up with the theory that there was a situation where Kronk had gotten information from somebody in the jail. And I think that`s what -- I think that`s what it`s about. It`s about Susan (ph), his sister, Crystal (ph), his son, Brandon (ph), and the judge keeping it under wraps for the prosecution so that nobody tampers with them or harasses them. They`re very concerned about being contacted by the defense.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

GRACE: Out to you, Leonard Padilla. Now they`ve dug up the ex-wife to bad- mouth the utility meter reader, but you say that he found out about the location of the body from none other but Casey Anthony, tot mom herself, via the jailhouse.

PADILLA: Yes, I think Casey Anthony herself revealed certain information that was passed on to Kronk by his girlfriend, who works at the jail. Subsequently, he bragged about it in front of his relatives.

I think the judge is looking at the prosecution side of the thing and saying the justice system and law enforcement system of this county could be on trial here if we don`t figure out what to do with this situation because if law enforcement knew about it and it was passed on to Kronk and he eventually came up with the information, did the people that -- like Sergeant Allen, when he came out and jacked (ph) me out, you know, and got all upset at me out at the Little Econ -- was he aware that the body was not there and that it was out there about a quarter mile from the parents` house? So right now, the judge is in a quandary, like, What do I do with this mess that`s been created...

GRACE: Right.

PADILLA: ... within the jail?

GRACE: Long story short, by coming forward, Kronk has now unwittingly become a scapegoat for the defense, along with a whole list of others.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1002/26/ng.01.html

by Estee on Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:41 am

If Kronk did hear about it from a person that overheard a jail conversation...isn't that considered hearsay????

by Snaz on Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:09 pm

Estee wrote:If Kronk did hear about it from a person that overheard a jail conversation...isn't that considered hearsay????

No. As I understand it, IF (and that's a big IF) Kronk's "GF" overheard KC confess to JB where Caylee's body was and then told RK, then it would depend on the circumstances of overhearing. If they were in a private room and the GF eavesdropped, then all the evidence gathered from that could be disallowed at trial. That would include the remains and everything else found at the site.

However, if they were out in the open and the GF overheard a "confession" by KC, the evidence obtained would be allowed in. There is NO EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY if they are speaking out in the open.

Having said all that..... I, personally, find LP's daisy chain theory to be completely ridiculous. Besides the fact that since the day he inserted himself into this case... NOT ONE of his theories and "statements of fact" have born out to be true.

by Estee on Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:14 pm

Thanks Snaz for clarifying that... praise

by randilynn on Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:45 pm

one could make the argument that no matter where in the jail the conversation occurred, there is NO reasonable expectation of privacy in a jail...

i also think the argument could be made, that if the person/s involved are NOT affiliated with LE (ie kronk) the finding of the remains would stand, and not be able to be thrown out based on the "fruit from the poisonous tree" .. no one would be able to testify to the conversation, that could be considered hearsay, however, the 3rd party not LE affiliated would be just that, the discoverer.

the evidentiary rules do not apply to plain old citizens. with RK acting on his own, and not engaged by LE, i dont believe they would ever be able to have the remains thrown out of evidence.

JM thoughts.

Leonard Padilla and his Daisy Chain Theory

Leonard Padilla and his Daisy Chain Theory

Re: Leonard Padilla and his Daisy Chain Theory

Re: Leonard Padilla and his Daisy Chain Theory

Re: Leonard Padilla and his Daisy Chain Theory

Re: Leonard Padilla and his Daisy Chain Theory

Re: Leonard Padilla and his Daisy Chain Theory

Re: Leonard Padilla and his Daisy Chain Theory

Re: Leonard Padilla and his Daisy Chain Theory

Re: Leonard Padilla and his Daisy Chain Theory

Re: Leonard Padilla and his Daisy Chain Theory