Re: Lisa Irwin, 10 months old, Kansas City, MO, Missing 10/4/11

by FystyAngel on Mon Nov 14, 2011 10:27 pm

So this guy "Dane" had the phone that night AND he has fallen off the face of the earth? Oh...and LE says he's not a suspect nor a POI. Why hide then? Things that make you go hhhmmmm???

by Cali on Tue Nov 15, 2011 1:57 am

Why is it that this case has so many suspicious players who are only interested in covering their own butts.

by Sherry on Tue Nov 15, 2011 1:14 pm

by Sherry on Wed Nov 16, 2011 4:48 pm

by Justice4all on Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:33 pm

Missing baby Lisa Irwin mystery phone man says he had phone that got call from Irwin family cell

Posted: 7:48 AM
Last Updated: 6 hours and 29 minutes ago
Russ Ptacek, nbcactionnews.com

KANSAS CITY, Mo. - In his first comments, the Baby Lisa mystery phone man said he has “no connection” to the missing baby, but he and his father acknowledge he did have the phone that received a call from one of the missing Irwin phones.

Police have said he is not a suspect, so we are not identifying him by his last name.

“The truth will rise to the top,” the mystery phone man, Dane said. “I have no connection with Megan Wright or the missing child.”

Read more: http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/national/missing-baby-lisa-irwin-mystery-phone-man-says-he-had-phone-that-got-call-from-irwin-family-cell

by Sherry on Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:14 pm

by Gia on Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:40 pm

This case just seems to be getting stranger by the second. In one sense I believe that an accident occurred which Deborah has covered up. But then I also cannot dismiss the sightings of a man carrying a baby and the connection between Jersey and Megan ... which makes me also suspect that Jersey may have snatched Lisa.

And of course with LE being so tight lipped this case is also being pushed forward with lots of speculation. Is Kansas LE always this tight lipped?

by Cali on Sun Nov 20, 2011 8:07 pm

Mommy knows where baby is hidden, but she won't tell.
She knows she won't luck out with a jury like Casey's.

IMO

by Julie on Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:01 pm

Missing Baby Lisa Irwin Case at Three Months; New Lead Found

By William Browning | Yahoo! Contributor Network – Thu, Jan 5, 2012

KCTV out of Kansas City, Mo., reports the lawyers for Deborah Bradley and Jeremy Irwin say new leads have been found and are being followed in the case of missing baby Lisa Irwin. One is listed as "promising," even though authorities have said the number of tips has dwindled.

snipped:

* The current lead has supposedly been in the works for weeks. Authorities aren't commenting on the new lead, although family members have said they want to talk about the lead to the public. They aren't sure when the baby's parents or their attorneys will discuss the lead.

Read more :
http://news.yahoo.com/missing-baby-lisa-irwin-case-three-months-lead-003500357.html

by Ann - Tx on Mon Jan 30, 2012 10:40 pm

For your info, Deb Bradley , Jeremy Irwin and their attorney Joe Tacopino will be guests on the
Dr. Phil Show this Friday, 2-3-12.

Check your local listing for time and channel if you get the Dr. Phil Show in your viewing area.
________

http://drphil.com/shows/
Dr. Phil Show - 2-3-12

Snipped from Show Schedule page:

Friday - February 3, 2012

Missing in a Moment: Baby Lisa

Ten-month-old baby Lisa disappeared from her home on October 3, 2011 and hasn't been seen since then. Her parents, Deborah Bradley and Jeremy Irwin, say Lisa was abducted from her crib that fateful night. In this Dr. Phil exclusive, the distraught couple, joined by their attorney, Joe Tacopina, breaks their three-month silence. Did Deborah, who admits to being drunk the night Lisa went missing, have any involvement in the baby's disappearance? How does she explain reports that she failed a polygraph test? And why have Deborah and Jeremy been accused of being uncooperative? Plus, hear the couples' explanation for their apparent inconsistent recollections about which lights were on in the house and the mysterious phone call reportedly made from Deborah’s cell phone on the night Lisa went missing. Then hear from the private investigator who has been searching for Lisa: where does he think the baby is, and why does he believe she’s still alive? Don't miss this Dr. Phil exclusive.

by Ann - Tx on Mon Jan 30, 2012 10:46 pm

Valhall of The Hinky Meter has written numerous articles about the Lisa Irwin case.

The Hinky Meter members are following this case closely and they update the thread(s) as news unfolds in the Lisa Irwin Case. There are numerous Links to mainstream media articles and other sources posted on the thread(s).

You do not have to be a member of The Hinky Meter to read in the Forum.

http://www.thehinkymeter.com/phpbb/viewforum.php?f=60
The Hinky Meter by Valhall -- Forum: Lisa Irwin case

by Sherry on Sun Feb 19, 2012 8:36 pm

Websleuths on the Lisa Irwin Case

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/websleuths/2012/02/20/websleuths-radio?utm_source=BTRemail&utm_medium=ShowReminder

by Justice4all on Wed Feb 22, 2012 2:36 pm

by Justice4all on Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:21 pm

Witness in Lisa Irwin case now facing stabbing charge

Updated: Feb 22, 2012 3:26 PM EST
By Chris Oberholtz, Multimedia Producer
By DeAnn Smith, Digital Content Manager

~Snipped~

Greathouse became embroiled in the search for Lisa because he had access to a cell phone that has a connection to the case.

Authorities wanted to know whether Greathouse had a phone in question when someone using Bradley's cell phone attempted to call a cell phone owned by Megan Wright at 11:57 p.m. Oct. 3.

Wright said investigators have questioned her four times about a cell phone call made from one of Bradley's cell phones just a few hours before her daughter was reported missing.

Greathouse had access to Wright's phone and police wanted to know if the phone call was intended for him. Greathouse talked to police and reportedly has denied any involvement in Lisa's disappearance.

Read more: http://www.kctv5.com/story/16969868/witness-in-lisa-irwin-case-faces-stabbing-charge

by tesstruhart on Mon May 21, 2012 10:37 am

Megyn Kelly‏@megynkelly
Just taped 2-part i'view w/Baby Lisa's parents. Did someone use her dad's CC on a website that changes baby names?? Tune in 2day 1p on FNC!

Lisa Irwin News for today

by Ann - Tx on Mon May 21, 2012 12:49 pm

Snipped from Stolat's comment on Developing Stories:

Stolat wrote:

Jeremy Irwin claims that someone stole his debit card one month after Lisa was reported missing. DID ANYONE REMEMBER THIS IMPORTANT DETAIL? This was news to me and more importantly, why is it news to the media? This would have been an important aspect of the search had it been made known (assuming it had been true). Jeremy claims that a charge on his stolen card was made to an overseas site that changes baby names for a fee. What he doesn't add is that it is not a site dedicated to changing only baby names, but people's names in general.

From the article:
During the interview, Ann Curry said an NBC producer looked at the charges on Jeremy Irwin’s credit card, and they appear to lead to a website for a stationery paper company.

“I don’t know why it takes you there now,” Jeremy Irwin responded, “but when we first found out about this in December, that’s where it used to go was the website where you can change someone’s name online.”

Well, I think this is pretty simple to answer -- someone needs to look at Jeremy's computer and review the cache folder for his internet page hits. Stuff will be cached there - icons graphics - anything relating to the page as it appeared when he *allegedly* viewed it and saw what he claims. Someone could be able to tell based on what is cached there if he really saw it as he claims.

Did he take any screenshots when he saw that site??? Did he print off pages from that site?? My guess is no - and conveniently so. But if FBI really wanted to - they could validate this claim. My suspicion is that based on the fact they say it didn't generate any leads tells me there is a very good reason why -- and that this is yet another excuse for them to point the finger at someone else. Hence their complaint:

"Bradley said while she understands the police and FBI have jobs to do, the answers she has received about her daughter are unacceptable. "

Just as her answers and lack of SEARCHING of any kind on her part are unacceptable as well. But such is life when you've returned back to 100%.

http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/national/missing-baby-lisa-irwin-parents-hope-fraudulent-debit-card-charge-leads-to-break-in-case

Source:

http://www.realitychatter.com/t3810p180-developing-stories#140185
RC - Developing Stories

by tesstruhart on Mon May 21, 2012 1:21 pm

Wow, Stolat, I never heard he was missing a CC. Why do they keep throwing red herrings out there. If life is back to 'normal' and it seems LE cannot find her or good leads, why bring it up?

by Stolat on Mon May 21, 2012 1:28 pm

tesstruhart wrote:Wow, Stolat, I never heard he was missing a CC. Why do they keep throwing red herrings out there. If life is back to 'normal' and it seems LE cannot find her or good leads, why bring it up?

I don't know, but perhaps if they feel LE is still building a case against them they still need to throw out herrings.

I wonder if they are claiming her on their taxes as a dependent. I wonder what proof is needed to claim a dependent on taxes and does the IRS check against missing childrens records to jutify the claim of dependency?

by Stolat on Mon May 21, 2012 1:59 pm

tesstruhart wrote:Wow, Stolat, I never heard he was missing a CC. Why do they keep throwing red herrings out there. If life is back to 'normal' and it seems LE cannot find her or good leads, why bring it up?

And according to this article -- they KNEW about it 4 weeks after her disappearance! This is not something they are claiming is new. Why now?? Why come out with this now? Perhaps the IRS is calling bullshit on their taxes and # of dependents.

And someone explain to me why they didn't cancel their so-called stolen card one month after it was stolen??? You can still track a stolen card even after you cancel it. I did. You can still see when/where someone *attempted* to use your cold card (hot card means it's still active and non-reported as stolen).

And in fact, if they didn't cancel it -- what proof do we have that they weren't the ones who tried to use it and stage a fraud charge??

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/21/baby-lisa-irwin-clue-debit-card-name-changing-website_n_1532786.html

by Freckles on Mon May 21, 2012 2:15 pm

Ann - Tx wrote:
Snipped from Stolat's comment on Developing Stories:

Stolat wrote:

Jeremy Irwin claims that someone stole his debit card one month after Lisa was reported missing.
-- Was this reported to LE?

DID ANYONE REMEMBER THIS IMPORTANT DETAIL? This was news to me and more importantly, why is it news to the media? This would have been an important aspect of the search had it been made known (assuming it had been true). Jeremy claims that a charge on his stolen card was made to an overseas site that changes baby names for a fee.
--Now most people would have used a stole bank card for gasoline (just swipe it) or WalMart purchases, etc. Who would have thought to take the baby, the cell phones, AND a bank card JUST to change the baby's name?

What he doesn't add is that it is not a site dedicated to changing only baby names, but people's names in general.

From the article:
During the interview, Ann Curry said an NBC producer looked at the charges on Jeremy Irwin’s credit card, and they appear to lead to a website for a stationery paper company.
-- Stationery company? As in printing of flyers and stuff?

“I don’t know why it takes you there now,” Jeremy Irwin responded, “but when we first found out about this in December, that’s where it used to go was the website where you can change someone’s name online.”
--- Now how would he know that?

Well, I think this is pretty simple to answer -- someone needs to look at Jeremy's computer and review the cache folder for his internet page hits. Stuff will be cached there - icons graphics - anything relating to the page as it appeared when he *allegedly* viewed it and saw what he claims. Someone could be able to tell based on what is cached there if he really saw it as he claims.

Did he take any screenshots when he saw that site??? Did he print off pages from that site?? My guess is no - and conveniently so. But if FBI really wanted to - they could validate this claim. My suspicion is that based on the fact they say it didn't generate any leads tells me there is a very good reason why -- and that this is yet another excuse for them to point the finger at someone else. Hence their complaint:

"Bradley said while she understands the police and FBI have jobs to do, the answers she has received about her daughter are unacceptable. "

Just as her answers and lack of SEARCHING of any kind on her part are unacceptable as well. But such is life when you've returned back to 100%.

http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/national/missing-baby-lisa-irwin-parents-hope-fraudulent-debit-card-charge-leads-to-break-in-case

Source:

http://www.realitychatter.com/t3810p180-developing-stories#140185
RC - Developing Stories